Hi, On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 4:56 PM Martin Vignali <martin.vign...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Le mar. 4 déc. 2018 à 16:12, Jean-Baptiste Kempf <j...@videolan.org> a > écrit : > > > But then, you will get absolutely all the integration from ALL the > various > > non-open source multimedia libraries, because it is useful to someone. > > Including shims for Adobe, Dolby and others. > > I'm probably disagree with you on this subject ! :-) > https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org/patch/7329/ (see also my response to that [1]) Or just on IRC today (!) "<LigH> JVET VVC just got ready to be built with MSYS/MinGW too ... so I guess it is not yet in a stage to be considered to be linked into ffmpeg. What would be your criteria to consider this encoder? How would we get to know that you start considering it? Looking for a thread in the mailing list?" I'm surprised this patch made it in, I've always assumed we were uncomfortable with closed-source software and that the hardware-support was a corner-case. Can I submit a wrapper for my closed-source VP9 encoder? Ronald [1] https://ffmpeg-devel.ffmpeg.narkive.com/Ok5y3HXO/patch-0-3-codec-wrapper-for-librv11-and-rmhd-muxer-demuxer#post35 _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
