On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 08:40:07AM +0800, myp...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 6:03 AM Moritz Barsnick <barsn...@gmx.net> wrote:
> >
> > > +    if (dec_ctx->rc_max_rate > 0) print_val ("max_bit_rate", 
> > > dec_ctx->rc_max_rate, unit_bit_per_second_str);
> > > +    else                          print_str_opt("max_bit_rate", "N/A");
> > >      if (dec_ctx && dec_ctx->bits_per_raw_sample > 0) 
> > > print_fmt("bits_per_raw_sample", "%d", dec_ctx->bits_per_raw_sample);
> >
> > If the (now) second condition needs to check for validity of dec_ctx,
> > shouldn't the new first one also need to check?
> >
> >
> Ha, I guess I missed the check, will update, Thanks

this failure shows up in fate btw: (unless this was some other issue in this 
patch)
make: *** [fate-mpegts-probe-pmt-merge] Error 139
make: *** [fate-mxf-probe-dnxhd] Error 139

[...]

-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Republics decline into democracies and democracies degenerate into
despotisms. -- Aristotle

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to