2018-11-01 22:12 GMT+01:00, Philip Langdale <phil...@overt.org>: > On 2018-11-01 14:05, Timo Rothenpieler wrote: >> On 01.11.2018 21:54, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >>> 2018-10-26 17:56 GMT+02:00, Philip Langdale <phil...@overt.org>: >>> >>> Could you add some sample numbers about how fast the cuda >>> variant is compared to cpu? >> >> I don't think such numbers are overly useful by themselves. >> The primary benefit here is that it's now possible to decode, >> deinterlace and encode all without pulling the frames out of VRAM. >> >> Though it would definitely be interesting. I guess hwupload + >> yadif_cuda + hwdownload vs. normal yadif is a fair comparison? > > Yeah, the comparison is a bit fuzzy, because you completely > change how you think about solving the problem depending on whether > you have a filter available or not. But I did get some data previously. > > For cpu decode + cpu yadif, the yadif slowdown is ~50% > For gpu decode + gpu yadif, the yadif slowdown is ~25%
Thank you! Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
