On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 11:30 AM Jacob Trimble <modma...@google.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 2:35 PM Jacob Trimble <modma...@google.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 11:50 AM Michael Niedermayer > > <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 03:50:57PM -0700, Jacob Trimble wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > > > > So how about, when we see an encrypted frame, we flush the parser > > > > before skipping the frame? Can we just flush the parser and then > > > > reuse it later? Or would we need to create a new parser if we saw > > > > clear frames later? > > > > > > try/test it and review the code. only way to know for sure what works > > > > > > thanks > > > > > > [...] > > > -- > > > Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB > > > > > > The bravest are surely those who have the clearest vision > > > of what is before them, glory and danger alike, and yet > > > notwithstanding go out to meet it. -- Thucydides > > > _______________________________________________ > > > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > > > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > > > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > > > Here is a new patch that flushes the parser before returning the > > encrypted packets. It also logs when it does this. > > Ping. Is this better?
Ping. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
