On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 9:35 AM Vittorio Giovara <vittorio.giov...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 5:28 PM Jan Ekström <jee...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 10:58 PM Alex Sukhanov <alx.sukha...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Mark, > > > > > > at Google we have some old service which is still running and it works > > only > > > with the IVF container. It would be great if ffmpeg could generate such > > > videos so we could give them to the service then. Given that ffmpeg IVF > > > demuxer already supports reading such files, I think it's reasonable to > > > make IVF muxer be able to generate them. > > > Hope it answers the question. > > > > > > Thank you > > > > Given the amount of code is not large I'm not against having it in, > > but if it's not something that ever was meant to go into the public > > I'd probably disable creation of such files unless you enable a less > > standards-compliant strictness mode. > > > > maybe creation of such files could be allowed only with a strict compliance > flag? > -- > Vittorio > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel Vittorio, can you please elaborate your proposal? Is there already a flag in ffmpeg that we can consider use for that? What would be a benefit of guarding h264/hevc muxing into the IVF container by the flag? Thank you _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
