On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 10:40 AM Timo Rothenpieler <t...@rothenpieler.org> wrote: > > > I don't think it's YUVJ all over again, as it was the exact same bit > layout than normal YUV, while this one is actually different. >
Its also the same bit layout as YUV444P16, with one piece of additional metadata tacked on top - seems quite similar to YUVJ to me. - Hendrik _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
