On 10/7/18, Daniel Molkentin <dan...@molkentin.de> wrote: > > On 07.10.2018 18:02, Daniel Molkentin wrote: >> This allows switching between absolute (LUFS) and relativ (LU) display >> in the status line. >> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Molkentin <dan...@molkentin.de> >> Signed-off-by: Conrad Zelck <c.ze...@imail.de> >> --- >> doc/filters.texi | 4 ++++ >> libavfilter/f_ebur128.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- >> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/doc/filters.texi b/doc/filters.texi >> index 601cbda17c..dc01c805b2 100644 >> --- a/doc/filters.texi >> +++ b/doc/filters.texi >> @@ -19371,6 +19371,10 @@ by EBU R128. However, material published online >> may prefer a level of -16LUFS >> Set the value displayed by the gauge. Valid values are m (momentary) and >> s (short-term). >> By default the momentary value will be used, but in certain scenarios it >> may be more useful >> to observe the short term value instead (e.g. live mixing). >> + >> +@item mabsolute >> +Sets whether to display the loudness in LUFS (1, the default) LU relative >> to the target (0). >> +This only affects the video output, not the summary or continous log >> output. >> @end table >> > On a second thought, should this maybe be measurement=absolute|relative > or measurement=LU|LUFS? Opinions? More descriptive that way...
Yeah, that one is more descriptive, you also can have aliases so can have both absolute/relative/LU/LUFS _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
