Am Do., 30. Aug. 2018 um 10:37 Uhr schrieb Thomas Mundt <tmund...@gmail.com >:
> Am Mo., 27. Aug. 2018 um 20:40 Uhr schrieb Thomas Mundt < > tmund...@gmail.com>: > >> Am Mo., 27. Aug. 2018 um 19:40 Uhr schrieb Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com >> >: >> >>> On 8/27/18, Thomas Mundt <tmund...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > Am Fr., 24. Aug. 2018 um 15:05 Uhr schrieb Paul B Mahol < >>> one...@gmail.com>: >>> > >>> >> On 8/23/18, Thomas Mundt <tmund...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> > Currently numerical option values are misinterpreted in vf_interlace >>> >> > filter. >>> >> > Patch attached. >>> >> > >>> >> > Regards, >>> >> > Thomas >>> >> > >>> >> >>> >> ok >>> >> >>> > >>> > Thanks. Can you please push it? >>> >>> Does this breaks tinterlace numerical options? >>> >>> Anyway numerical options are not supported, and is free to change. >>> >> >> Indeed the numerical usage of the tinterlace option "flags" is changed. >> But, as you say, numerical usage is not supported or even documented in >> this case. >> The "mode" option is unchanged and can be used numerical as documented. >> > > Ping. > Do you still have concerns? > Ping. This patch fixes a regression and should be pushed. Paul, please tell me if you need more time or information or if I should ask someone else. Regards, Thomas _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
