On 23/08/18 01:44, myp...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 5:51 PM Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> 2018-08-22 2:42 GMT+02:00, myp...@gmail.com <myp...@gmail.com>:
>>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 4:45 PM Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> 2018-06-11 13:22 GMT+02:00, Jun Zhao <mypopy...@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> + * Copyright (c) 2018 Jun Zhao
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * VA-API Acceleration API (video decoding/scaling) sample
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * This file is part of FFmpeg.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * FFmpeg is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
>>>>> + * modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
>>>>> + * License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
>>>>> + * version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
>>>>
>>>> This is not an ideal license for doc/examples.
>>>
>>> I didn't realize this problem, any other license be suggested? MIT ?
>>
>> I think so, yes.
>>
> Will change the license and update the other vaapi_xxx sample (after
> asking the other related contributor with mail), Thanks.

I agree that all of my changes to hw_decode.c, vaapi_encode.c, 
vaapi_transcode.c in doc/examples can be relicensed to MIT.

(I'm not sure anything other than b0d9eab7 is nontrivial enough to matter, but 
the above is clear.)

Thanks,

- Mark
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to