Gyan Doshi (2018-08-06): > >Ah yes, Sorry, this is used for parsing. What protocol do you suggest for > >correcting this? > > Any thoughts on this?
Not really. I suppose you could add the field with the correct name and remove the bogus one later. But your thoughts on this are probably better than mine. > I see that there were two changes made to value fields of the progress > report earlier this year - a194e9c4159 and 1322b00060 It is true, but past mistakes cannot be used to justify new ones. Also, it seems to me theses changes are much less serious: 1322b00060 only changes the precision in a compatible way, while the second only changes anything when the required value is unavailable. Regards, -- Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
