On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 6:48 AM, Ricardo Constantino <wiia...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 14 February 2018 at 12:56, Tomas Härdin <tjop...@acc.umu.se> wrote: > > > On 2018-02-14 13:50, Kyle Schwarz wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 7:45 AM, Hendrik Leppkes <h.lepp...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 1:32 PM, Kyle Schwarz <zera...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> > >>>> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 7:20 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com > > > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> 2018-02-14 13:12 GMT+01:00 Kyle Schwarz <zera...@gmail.com>: > >>>>> > >>>>>> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 6:54 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos < > ceffm...@gmail.com> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> 2018-02-14 12:21 GMT+01:00 Kyle Schwarz <zera...@gmail.com>: > >>>>>>> Sorry, I wasn't immediately able to find the sources for the > >>>>>>> ndi library: Please post a link. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> The only official way I know to get the SDK is by providing them > with > >>>>>> an email when selecting "Download": https://www.newtek.com/ndi/sdk/ > >>>>>> > >>>>> Do you have the sources that allow to build the library "ndi" (that > >>>>> FFmpeg links against), to change it and redistribute it? > >>>>> > >>>> No, the library comes pre built in the SDK. > >>>> > >>> If you need to link against a proprietary binary, then the resulting > >>> binary is no longer GPL compatible, and as such non-free, no matter > >>> the license of the headers. > >>> > >> Good to know, thanks for clearing this up. Sounds like NewTek might be > >> a little confused about this: > >> https://ffmpeg.zeranoe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=42&p=13238#p13238 > >> > > > > This applies only to the CLI. The libraries are LGPL, so things may be > > different there depending on how things are packaged/linked. The LGPL > > permits distributing proprietary object files such that a functioning > > library may be linked together. See https://www.gnu.org/licenses/g > > pl-faq.en.html#LGPLStaticVsDynamic > > > > > The SDK license agreement also mentions that it's unredistributable. > Doesn't that make it as nonfree as decklink's? > Interestingly, they SDK license says the SDK is "non redistributable" but says that particular files can override that. for instance here is the file "Processing.NDI.Lib.h" header: // NOTE : The following MIT license applies to this file ONLY and not to the SDK as a whole. Please review the SDK documentation // for the description of the full license terms, which are also provided in the file "NDI License Agreement.pdf" within the SDK or // online at http://new.tk/ndisdk_license/. Your use of any part of this SDK is acknowledgment that you agree to the SDK license // terms. THe full NDI SDK may be downloaded at https://www.newtek.com/ndi/sdk/ // //*********************************************************************************************************************************************** // // Copyright(c) 2014-2017 NewTek, inc // // Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation // files(the "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, // merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and / or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is // furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions : // // The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software. // // THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF // MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT.IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE // FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION // WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE. // //*********************************************************************************************************************************************** … FWIW. It might be compatible with the LGPL. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
