On 6/2/18, Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 5/2/18, Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 9/11/16, Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 9/10/16, Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote: >>>> Le quartidi 24 fructidor, an CCXXIV, Paul B Mahol a ecrit : >>>>> So everybody agrees, we should proceed. >>>> >>>> I am proceeding, but as you can see in the patch, there is still a fair >>>> amount of work to be done. Still, people can help if they want to speed >>>> things up, especially since a significant part of the work is design >>>> decisions that I can not do alone and will need to be discussed. >>>> >>>> What needs to be done (using this mail as a notepad, but including the >>>> tasks >>>> where help is required): >>>> >>>> - Finish documenting the scheduling and make sure the implementation >>>> matches >>>> the documentation. >>>> >>>> - Discuss if "private_fields.h" is acceptable or decide another >>>> solution. >>>> >>>> - Clearly identify and isolate the parts of the scheduling that are >>>> needed >>>> only for request_frame()/request_frame() compatibility. >>>> >>>> - Decide exactly what parts of the scheduling are the responsibility of >>>> filters (possibly in the compatibility activate function) and what >>>> parts >>>> are handled by the framework. >>>> >>>> - Think ahead about threading and use wrapper to access fields that >>>> will >>>> require locking or synchronization. >>>> >>>> - Think about features whose need I realized while trying to get it >>>> working: >>>> distinguish productive / processing activation, synchronize several >>>> filter >>>> graphs. >>>> >>>> Please feel free to ask details about any of these points: not only >>>> would >>>> getting interest help me stay motivated, but discussing implementation >>>> details and explaining the design would help me having a clear idea of >>>> the >>>> whole system. >>> >>> For start removal of recursiveness is mostly I'm interested in. >>> What needs to be done for that, can I help somehow? >>> >> >> Hi, >> >> So what's remain to be done to have frame threading in lavfi? >> > > Ping >
Ping _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
