On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 11:49 AM, Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote: > On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 12:53:46AM +0200, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >> 2018-05-16 0:29 GMT+02:00, Hendrik Leppkes <h.lepp...@gmail.com>: >> >> > It makes no real difference if its less efficient or whatever - >> > if a codec specification asks for this behavior, then our >> > decoders should act accordingly. >> >> I wonder where this suddenly comes from? >> (I was away from my mail client when a similar argument >> was used a few weeks ago and I forgot later.) >> Luckily, many of our codecs do smarter things >> than the specifications asks for... >> >> Do we have a specification for qtrle? > > Iam only aware of the one "we", that is more correctly mike melanson > wrote: https://multimedia.cx/qtrle.txt > > I think this invalidates the argument, so if i hear no objections then > ill apply this patch in a few days >
How does that invalidate the argument that you take a compressed CRF stream and suddenly decide to make VFR out of it? Because it does not. - Hendrik _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
