2018-02-14 13:50 GMT+01:00 Kyle Schwarz <zera...@gmail.com>: > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 7:45 AM, Hendrik Leppkes <h.lepp...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 1:32 PM, Kyle Schwarz <zera...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 7:20 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> 2018-02-14 13:12 GMT+01:00 Kyle Schwarz <zera...@gmail.com>: >>>>> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 6:54 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> 2018-02-14 12:21 GMT+01:00 Kyle Schwarz <zera...@gmail.com>: >>>>>> Sorry, I wasn't immediately able to find the sources for the >>>>>> ndi library: Please post a link. >>>>> >>>>> The only official way I know to get the SDK is by providing them with >>>>> an email when selecting "Download": https://www.newtek.com/ndi/sdk/ >>>> >>>> Do you have the sources that allow to build the library "ndi" (that >>>> FFmpeg links against), to change it and redistribute it? >>> >>> No, the library comes pre built in the SDK. >> >> If you need to link against a proprietary binary, then the resulting >> binary is no longer GPL compatible, and as such non-free, no matter >> the license of the headers. > > Good to know, thanks for clearing this up. Sounds like NewTek might be > a little confused about this: > https://ffmpeg.zeranoe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=42&p=13238#p13238
I don't think they are confused: They would welcome you to distribute FFmpeg binaries that link against their sdk. The GPL does not allow this though. Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel