On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 11:20:22PM +0000, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote: > On 20 January 2018 at 17:26, Aurelien Jacobs <au...@gnuage.org> wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 10:54:34PM +0100, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > > > 2018-01-14 14:06 GMT+01:00 Aurelien Jacobs <au...@gnuage.org>: > > > > > > > Well, here is an updated patch which uses codec tags for the decoder > > and > > > > profile for the encoder. > > > > > > Sorry but I object to this patch: > > > We should not invent codec_tags. > > > > OK, I understand, and I agree. > > > > But now we are in an interlocking situation. > > We have 2 solutions to handle aptX vs. aptX HD but those 2 solutions have > > been rejected by 2 different person. > > > > Do anybody have a 3rd solution, that everyone would accept ? > > > > And if not, how do we resolve this ? > > Is there any policy nowadays to handle this kind of interlocking ? > > > > Fine, I see no choice but to use multiple codec IDs for aptxhd since the > format really provides you with nothing bitstream wise to determine what it > is. Even game codecs have a bit or two for version.
OK. Good. Now, will someone push the original patchset ? Or should I rebase it and submt it again ? _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
