On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 01:58:10PM +0100, Reto Kromer wrote: > Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > >To clarify my suggestion, > >the algorithm should be tuned for high bit depth before using > >it for long term storage. This would be v4 (or later). > >Personally i would wait for v4 and not use v3 for high bit > >depth. Which is why i think its not smart to extend the v3 > >implementation with more high depth support. > > The issue is that in the real world we need to use the format > now. Otherwise the film archives must use MXF/DPX instead of > Матрёшка/FFV1. That's the point!
Then using the v3 16bit is probably the most realistic option. And jeromes patch should probably be applied I hope this will not reduce interrest in working on a improved 9-16bit mode in v4. [...] > Last but not least, since almost two years now it's impossible > to work on the development of FFV1 v4. It's always the wrong > time and/or the wrong place every time I am doing something for > this cause. Why? This is extremely frustrating. I want to understand this too. IMO v4 development should be more important than or at least equally to the v3 draft polishing and neither should block the other. -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Republics decline into democracies and democracies degenerate into despotisms. -- Aristotle
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
