On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 00:21:14 +0100 Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2018-01-26 0:00 GMT+01:00 Hendrik Leppkes <h.lepp...@gmail.com>: > > On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 11:35 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >>> and in particular stop outright harassing me into leaving. > >> > >> Yes, I would very much prefer if I could stop;-) > > > > So you openly admit to harassing a fellow developer, and > > even more so to your plans to not stop? > > I had the feeling he was harassing Michael several times in the > last hours, do you disagree? Well, going by your standards, harassment is just OK? Anyway, if my reply to Michael was too harsh/unfriendly, I hereby apologize (and I already wrote that on IRC too, where he lurks as michaelni). I'd still like to ask him to explicitly state whether his reply is a change request in context of a patch review, or just general advice when he's suggesting something that would be disproportionally more work and not solve the problem the original patch tried to solve. This is sort of irritating because you never know what you're supposed to do to get the patch OK'ed. I'd also like to point out that it _did_ happen in the past that Michael went off tangents in patch reviews and asked for unreasonable extra work because of minor issues. The AVFrame.opaque_ref fiasco (whose non-sensical later solution which he demanded was finally pushed, even though it still does not solve the issues he claimed his approach would solve) comes to mind, and I considered his general conduct on this issue harassment (not like I'd get an apology). I don't know what the other case of supposed harassment Carl Eugen is making up without providing any proof. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
