On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 17:03:26 -0800 Richard Shaffer <rshaf...@tunein.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 2:32 PM, wm4 <nfx...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > > I think this test program is pretty nice, though usually we try to get > > by with running the "ffmpeg" utility to test the libs. Having a > > relatively big program to test some obscure functionality might have a > > maintenance burden. I'm not sure how others feel about it; if nobody > > has a strong opinion on this I'll probably apply this in a week or so. > > > > It's definitely not my desire to create a maintenance burden for anyone. I > used the ffmpeg utility initially to test my changes, and I'm sure that > shell scripting would have been easier than writing a C program. > > There were pretty good templates for other test programs, but I didn't come > across a collection of shell scripts or Makefile targets that seemed to > illustrate a clear pattern. I'll look a little harder. If there is a > pointer to an example test, though, that would probably be useful. Most FATE tests use some sort of ffmpeg CLI invocation via shell, but it's pretty cryptic. Not sure what's a good example. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
