i think we do not need lock. and we need keep on the last codec pointer.
On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 2:28 AM, wm4 <nfx...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Thu, 4 Jan 2018 15:19:04 -0300 > James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> > > --- > > With this, the last users of libavutil's atomic wrappers are dealt > > with. > > Technically, you need to lock when reading the next pointers too? Don't > know if that actually matters. > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
