2017-12-15 8:22 GMT+01:00 Steven Robertson <ste...@strobe.cc>: > Actually QT has supported these codepoints for some time now internally, > but not officially. That said, I modified this to write nonsense values and > it interpreted everything as Rec 601 625 aka 470BG, which isn't great (I > think the default for anything should be 709 these days) but is not crazy > either.
Thank you for testing and reporting this! Please avoid top-posting here, Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
