On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 07:23:00PM +0100, Nicolas George wrote: > Michael Niedermayer (2017-12-01): > > As the one who tried implementing changing frame parameters like > > dimension long time ago, the only real problem i encountered was > > bikeshedding, i dont rememer a technical problem. > > "not easy" != "tremendously hard". I said it would not be easy, i.e. it > will require work and careful testing, but it is doable. >
> But what you did was wrong, too simple, and results in our libraries > outputting inconsistent data. Do you think this comment will fix any issue or improve anything ? First i do not even know what you speak of exactly and as this is supposedly about code i wrote, i doubt others will have a better idea. And there is possibly a difference in goals. Reinitializing filters would loose filter state, so avoiding reinit unless really needed was a big goal. Last but not least what i had envissioned is just in my head, i never implemeted it. (the bikeshedding made me loose interrest back then as i already mentioned) what is in git is a small part of it, that alone certainly is not that great. and "too simple" yes my vission of this was and is simple > > No time to say more today. > > Regards, > > -- > Nicolas George > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Avoid a single point of failure, be that a person or equipment.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
