>
>
>
> If you are searching for a case where the patch makes a difference
> one is:
> ./ffmpeg -i ~/tickets/4493/AVCI100.mov out.nut
> file should be here:
> http://samples.ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg-bugs/trac/ticket524/
>
> if you want more cases that change, ill see if i can find more
>
Perfect, thanks Michael. Let me check those samples out.
Here is a comparison of what I was described in the commit log.
The naming of the files images are
${pixfmt}_${scaled}_${in_range}_${out_range} for with/without the patch:
https://rawgit.com/nbirkbeck/ffmpeg-test-samples/master/color-range/results/report.html
My concern was the yuv444p10_${scaled}_jpeg_mpeg (explicit settings), give
different results than the implicit yuv444p10_unscaled_unspec_mpeg ones for
high bit depth. And the high bit depth is results are in general different
than the low bit depth ones.
Report generated with:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nbirkbeck/ffmpeg-test-samples/master/color-range/run.sh
Using these test files:
https://github.com/nbirkbeck/ffmpeg-test-samples/tree/master/color-range/data
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
