On Sun, Nov 26, 2017, at 12:57 PM, Jim DeLaHunt wrote: > I'll observe that we have already heard other opinions: > > * Paul[2]: "Not at all. To be a contributor, it is not needed to > subscribe to [ffmpeg-cvslog] list." > * Timo[3]: "Usually if a discussion comes up the mail from cvslog is > replied to on [ffmpeg-devel] list, so no actual discussion happens > on the automatic cvslog list."
ffmpeg-cvslog should only be a log and not a place for discussion. ffmpeg-devel should be the only mailing list where development discussions occur. Discussing a commit that was not reviewed should also occur at ffmpeg-devel. Currently there is little discussion in ffmpeg-cvslog (excluding discussions also directed to ffmpeg-devel), and I'm not sure how many patch authors actually read or see ffmpeg-cvslog only replies. Having no conversation in ffmpeg-cvslog would mean fewer pending messages in the infiniqueue for me to regularly deal with. Developers, contributors, maintainers, and/or committers should not need to subscribe to ffmpeg-cvslog to participate. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
