On 11/21/2017 11:40 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > I am against removing this paragraph.
He specifically asked if it was required of new developers to subscribe to this list, in a separate thread, earlier[1]. Paul explicitly said it was *not* required[2], Timo said no discussion happens on the list[3], and you gave a two word reply[4] that was completely devoid of actual information. You can see how this may have given Jim a different impression. Please, can we not be so abrasive and inconsistent with new contributers? It's shameful. - Derek [1] http://lists.ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2017-November/220271.html [2] http://lists.ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2017-November/220441.html [3] http://lists.ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2017-November/220272.html [4] http://lists.ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2017-November/220392.html _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
