On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 12:05:05PM -0800, Dale Curtis wrote: > On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 2:44 AM, Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc > > wrote: > > > > this would skip the code for wrap_bits >= 63, this does not look > > correct > > > > Why do you think that's incorrect? The max int64_t value is 1 << 63 and 2 > << 63 == 1 << 64 ?
I think its incorrect because the change would completely skip the loop but a wrap of "1<<64" would still need pts to be filled in. [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB No human being will ever know the Truth, for even if they happen to say it by chance, they would not even known they had done so. -- Xenophanes
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
