On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 5:00 AM, Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 01:51:34PM +0100, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >> 2017-11-16 13:44 GMT+01:00 Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc>: >> > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 01:04:27AM +0100, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >> >> 2017-11-15 13:34 GMT+01:00 Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc>: >> >> > Hi all >> >> > >> >> > I intend to make 3.4.1 very soon >> >> >> >> Shouldn't we first decide on how to proceed with #6775? >> > >> > This would be ideal. >> > >> > IIUC this is a regression from bddb2343b6e594e312dadb5d21b408702929ae04 >> >> This was confirmed by more than one developer, yes. >> >> > I see a patch that is said to improve 6775, can that be applied and >> > would that resolve this ? >> >> Iiuc, it would not completely resolve the issue, see: >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=881536 >> >> > If so why was it not applied yet ? >> >> The patch did not get support here, see: >> [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] lavc: reset codec on receiving packet after EOF >> in compat_decode > > > Is someone working on fixing this better than with the available patch ? >
I don't even agree this needs fixing. Those projects use the API wrong. - Hendrik _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
