2017-11-15 15:34 GMT+01:00 Mark Thompson <s...@jkqxz.net>: > On 14/11/17 22:30, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >> 2017-11-14 20:47 GMT+01:00 Mark Thompson <s...@jkqxz.net>: >> >>> Silly example using everything (for i965 VAAPI + Beignet): >>> >>> ./ffmpeg_g -y -init_hw_device vaapi=va:/dev/dri/renderD128 >>> -init_hw_device opencl=ocl@va -hwaccel vaapi >>> -hwaccel_device va -hwaccel_output_format vaapi -i in.mp4 >>> -f image2 -r 1 -i overlays/%d.png -an -filter_hw_device ocl >>> -filter_complex '[1:v]format=yuva420p,hwupload[x2]; >>> [0:v]scale_vaapi=1280:720:yuv420p,hwmap[x1]; >>> [x1][x2]overlay_opencl=0:0, >> >>> program_opencl=test.cl >> >> Is this the equivalent of the vhook functionality? > > I suppose it has some similarities.
> Is that a problem? That's exactly my question, I wonder if it is an issue. > The point of it is to allow the user to run simple pixel shaders > on the GPU side without having to integrate them into ffmpeg. Why would this only be possible for simple shaders? Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
