On 05/11/17 20:04, Timo Rothenpieler wrote: > Am 05.11.2017 um 19:59 schrieb Mark Thompson: >> On 05/11/17 18:42, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >>> 2017-11-05 19:35 GMT+01:00 Mark Thompson <s...@jkqxz.net>: >>>> On 05/11/17 18:28, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >>>>> 2017-11-05 15:24 GMT+01:00 Mark Thompson <s...@jkqxz.net>: >>>>>> On 30/10/17 19:51, Mark Thompson wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> "No external headers may be included in the ffmpeg tree." >>>>> >>>>> So you suggest to remove the Nvidia header? >>>> If that specific policy is adopted then it would have to be. >>> >>> Then I don't think this policy is useful. >>> >>> Iirc, there is a second external header, I have never used >>> either of those but judging from user response, both features >>> are heavily used making a removal a no-go. >> >> Ok, sure. >> >> How about: >> >> "No external headers may be added to the ffmpeg tree, unless they are for >> AviSynth or Nvidia." > > I don't think a strict "no external headers" rule makes sense or is a good > idea at all. Specially if there are seemingly arbitrary exceptions. > > If such a rule is to be added at all, it should list the conditions under > which external headers can be added. And it should clearly be an exception.
Sounds good to me. What should those conditions be? Thanks, - Mark _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
