On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 03:47:13PM +0700, Muhammad Faiz wrote: > On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 3:55 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Attached patch fixes a random testcase for ticket #6785 here but I > > don't know if this is the correct fix. > > > > Please review, Carl Eugen > > > > From a93b9309d74f5eadece371ee1e682d266af6cd83 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> > > Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2017 22:52:02 +0200 > > Subject: [PATCH] lswr/rematrix: Support s32p. > > > > Fixes ticket #6785. > > --- > > libswresample/rematrix.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------ > > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/libswresample/rematrix.c b/libswresample/rematrix.c > > index 66a43c1..a6aa6b0 100644 > > --- a/libswresample/rematrix.c > > +++ b/libswresample/rematrix.c > > @@ -445,14 +445,23 @@ av_cold int swri_rematrix_init(SwrContext *s){ > > s->mix_2_1_f = (mix_2_1_func_type*)sum2_double; > > s->mix_any_f = (mix_any_func_type*)get_mix_any_func_double(s); > > }else if(s->midbuf.fmt == AV_SAMPLE_FMT_S32P){ > > - // Only for dithering currently > > -// s->native_matrix = av_calloc(nb_in * nb_out, sizeof(double)); > > - s->native_one = av_mallocz(sizeof(int)); > > + s->native_one = av_mallocz(sizeof(int64_t)); > > if (!s->native_one) > > return AVERROR(ENOMEM); > > -// for (i = 0; i < nb_out; i++) > > -// for (j = 0; j < nb_in; j++) > > -// ((double*)s->native_matrix)[i * nb_in + j] = > > s->matrix[i][j]; > > + s->native_matrix = av_calloc(nb_in * nb_out, sizeof(int)); > > + if (!s->native_matrix) { > > + av_freep(&s->native_one); > > + return AVERROR(ENOMEM); > > + } > > + for (i = 0; i < nb_out; i++) { > > + double rem = 0; > > + > > + for (j = 0; j < nb_in; j++) { > > + double target = s->matrix[i][j] * 32768 + rem; > > + ((int*)s->native_matrix)[i * nb_in + j] = lrintf(target); > > + rem += target - ((int64_t*)s->native_matrix)[i * nb_in + > > j]; > > + } > > + } > > *((int*)s->native_one) = 32768; > > s->mix_1_1_f = (mix_1_1_func_type*)copy_s32; > > s->mix_2_1_f = (mix_2_1_func_type*)sum2_s32; > > The code is confusing. > Which is the type of native_matrix and native_one? int or int64_t?
they should be int if iam not mistaken [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB If a bugfix only changes things apparently unrelated to the bug with no further explanation, that is a good sign that the bugfix is wrong.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel