On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 03:47:13PM +0700, Muhammad Faiz wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 3:55 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Attached patch fixes a random testcase for ticket #6785 here but I
> > don't know if this is the correct fix.
> >
> > Please review, Carl Eugen
> >
> > From a93b9309d74f5eadece371ee1e682d266af6cd83 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com>
> > Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2017 22:52:02 +0200
> > Subject: [PATCH] lswr/rematrix: Support s32p.
> >
> > Fixes ticket #6785.
> > ---
> >  libswresample/rematrix.c |   21 +++++++++++++++------
> >  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/libswresample/rematrix.c b/libswresample/rematrix.c
> > index 66a43c1..a6aa6b0 100644
> > --- a/libswresample/rematrix.c
> > +++ b/libswresample/rematrix.c
> > @@ -445,14 +445,23 @@ av_cold int swri_rematrix_init(SwrContext *s){
> >          s->mix_2_1_f = (mix_2_1_func_type*)sum2_double;
> >          s->mix_any_f = (mix_any_func_type*)get_mix_any_func_double(s);
> >      }else if(s->midbuf.fmt == AV_SAMPLE_FMT_S32P){
> > -        // Only for dithering currently
> > -//         s->native_matrix = av_calloc(nb_in * nb_out, sizeof(double));
> > -        s->native_one    = av_mallocz(sizeof(int));
> > +        s->native_one    = av_mallocz(sizeof(int64_t));
> >          if (!s->native_one)
> >              return AVERROR(ENOMEM);
> > -//         for (i = 0; i < nb_out; i++)
> > -//             for (j = 0; j < nb_in; j++)
> > -//                 ((double*)s->native_matrix)[i * nb_in + j] = 
> > s->matrix[i][j];
> > +        s->native_matrix = av_calloc(nb_in * nb_out, sizeof(int));
> > +        if (!s->native_matrix) {
> > +            av_freep(&s->native_one);
> > +            return AVERROR(ENOMEM);
> > +        }
> > +        for (i = 0; i < nb_out; i++) {
> > +            double rem = 0;
> > +
> > +            for (j = 0; j < nb_in; j++) {
> > +                double target = s->matrix[i][j] * 32768 + rem;
> > +                ((int*)s->native_matrix)[i * nb_in + j] = lrintf(target);
> > +                rem += target - ((int64_t*)s->native_matrix)[i * nb_in + 
> > j];
> > +            }
> > +        }
> >          *((int*)s->native_one) = 32768;
> >          s->mix_1_1_f = (mix_1_1_func_type*)copy_s32;
> >          s->mix_2_1_f = (mix_2_1_func_type*)sum2_s32;
> 
> The code is confusing.
> Which is the type of native_matrix and native_one? int or int64_t?

they should be int if iam not mistaken

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

If a bugfix only changes things apparently unrelated to the bug with no
further explanation, that is a good sign that the bugfix is wrong.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to