Le septidi 7 brumaire, an CCXXVI, Paul B Mahol a écrit : > No it doesn't work like that any more. > > Some folks commit to maintained code by someone else without prior review. > > Why I should not be one of them?
Are you trying to derail the project on purpose? Now, please behave like a civilized member of a multi-user community. I want to review the patch to make sure it is now correct (remember it is the third iteration, the first two were wrong), because I care about code quality. I need time and good access to the source code for that. I am sorry, you will have to wait. Fortunately, this patch is not about security or a regression, it is about a harmless limitation that have been around for years, it can wait a few days more. I am sure you have plenty better to do with your time. This will probably the last mail I will have time to write this week-end; I would have preferred to spend it on something more interesting. When I come back, I expect to find things as is, or possibly an even better version on the patch waiting on the mailing list. Anything else would be a declaration of open hostility. -- Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
