On 10/22/2017 2:11 PM, James Almer wrote: > It was suggested, but nobody gave it a try (Or they did but found it > wasn't as simple as first thought?).
[...] > Thread sanitizer complains about this in every other run, and the tables > are at most 1k each, so this is not a bad solution and can be replaced > by ff_thread_once in the future. And say that N times and you end up with Nk of tables ;). That said, I'm not NAKing the patch, just suggesting an alternative. - Derek _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
