Am 17.10.17 um 20:37 schrieb Thilo Borgmann:
> Am 17.10.17 um 20:27 schrieb wm4:
>> On Tue, 17 Oct 2017 20:23:25 +0200
>> Thilo Borgmann <thilo.borgm...@mail.de> wrote:
>>
>>> Am 17.10.17 um 06:49 schrieb wm4:
>>>> I have realized that your veto is actually not valid:
>>>> - it's a Libav merge
>>>> - it has been for months in the Libav repo and you didn't specifically
>>>> care, nor did you make an attempt to merge the commit in a "fixed" way
>>>> - this patch would have been merged normally, and you wouldn't have
>>>> cared at all about it
>>>>
>>>> So unless you intend to make a better, working proposal, I will _not_
>>>> allow you to make this "my" problem. I will psuh this in 3 hours. After
>>>> that, you're free to to reimplement this in a different way or whatever
>>>> as a merge cleanup.
>>>
>>> Can you please stop this and just find a reasonable way to find consensus
>>> on the issues you're facing?
>>>
>>> Is it really of such importance that you want to push this although there
>>> are still concerns about what you want to do? Is this at all in any way
>>> relevant for security so that time would be at all a factor? I don't see
>>> any of your arguments mentioned above to be a valid reason to overrule
>>> someone else's opinion.
>>
>> I don't want trivial things getting blocked by pure bullshit that's
>> probably politically and not technically motivated.
>>
>> The best part about this dumb shit is that I could probably send
>> patches for cuvid/videotoolbox that use dumb workarounds (i.e. uglier
>> and shittier hacks) than the discussed patch, and NOBODY WOULD FUCKING
>> CARE.
>>
>> I'm pretty fed up with this shit.
>>
>> Please keep out of this discussion if you can't contribute anything too.
>
> I do care because I am delaying my work on some other cuvid related thing
> because of this.
>
> I would prefer not to dive into this topic any further because it seems
> rather "not so important" to my task. And just another cook in the kitchen
> would also more likely avoid conensus here.
>
> All I ask for is for you to find a reasonable to argue about your issues.
^
way
> I hope you see my point why I am raising my voice. Thanks!
>
> -Thilo
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
