On Thu, 12 Oct 2017 16:16:31 +0200 Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote:
> Le quintidi 15 vendémiaire, an CCXXVI, Daniel Kučera a écrit : > > I'm not sure if you mean this patch is unacceptable but if so, I want > > to note, that this patch is not the same as I submitted before: this > > one adds cmdlne option to ignore empty packets and it doesn't ignore > > them when not explicitly enabled. > > As for this particular solution, I think it exposes to the user the > innards of a work-around, this is not good at all. > > The good approach is to fix the bugs. You do not need to fix all of > them, just fix the one or two instances that break things for you: in > your use case, there is one line of code in the whole project that gets > ret=0 and thinks it means EOF: find it and fix it, and you should be > good. Other instance, if any, can be fixed as needed. You can't force an occasional contributor to fix deep issues to fix a minor bug, especially not with such a smug attitude. You need to provide some leeway. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
