2017-09-29 5:38 GMT+02:00 Jeyapal, Karthick <kjeya...@akamai.com>:
>>On 9/29/17, 7:36 AM, "James Almer" <jamr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> +static inline uint16_t parity (uint16_t x)
>>> +{
>>> + uint16_t i;
>>> + for (i = 4 * sizeof (x); i > 0; i /= 2)
>>> + x ^= x >> i;
>>> + return x & 1;
>>> +}
>>
>>Can't you use av_parity() instead?
>
> Yes, I can. Thanks for pointing it out. But that patch has been submitted
> already. Hence, I have attached a fresh patch with this suggested change.
Pushed assuming you have tested this.
Thank you, Carl Eugen
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
