2017-09-27 19:08 GMT+02:00 wm4 <nfx...@googlemail.com>: > Maybe you could get back to the technical discussion
I wish this were so easy with you: You first wrote: > That seems particularly pointless, since the user has > to force the demuxers. If I understand this sentence correctly, you agree with me that it should be as easy as possible for users to receive amrnb and amrwb streams. It should be added here that the demuxer always has to be forced - I don't know if auto-detecting amrnb and amrwb could be done but it is not part of the patch. (But the patch is a necessary prerequisite for this hypothetical auto-detection). The question for the user is though: How to force the codec? Then you wrote: > Then maybe there should be a mechanism to force > stream parameters How does this not contradict your first statement? It is probably (I did not immediately succeed) possible to allow users to first force the amr demuxer and - in addition - force a codec. But as we - seemingly - agree above that users should not have to force everything, I considered that actual patch much more useful. When you add the fact that you wrote that you refuse to read a user report to the contradiction, you will hopefully understand how futile it appears to have this technical discussion with you. > instead of this weird nonsense? Adding personal insults to every single one of your emails of course significantly strengthen above reasoning. Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
