On Sun, 2017-09-10 at 22:10 +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> enum {
> INDEX_MPEG2 = 0,
> INDEX_AES3,
> @@ -159,6 +139,26 @@ enum {
> INDEX_H264,
> };
>
> +static const struct {
> + enum AVCodecID id;
> + int index;
> +} mxf_essence_mappings[] = {
> + { AV_CODEC_ID_MPEG2VIDEO, INDEX_MPEG2 },
> + { AV_CODEC_ID_PCM_S24LE, INDEX_AES3 },
> + { AV_CODEC_ID_PCM_S16LE, INDEX_AES3 },
> + { AV_CODEC_ID_DVVIDEO, INDEX_DV },
> + { AV_CODEC_ID_DNXHD, INDEX_DNXHD_1080p_10bit_HIGH },
> + { AV_CODEC_ID_JPEG2000, INDEX_JPEG2000 },
> + { AV_CODEC_ID_H264, INDEX_H264 },
> + { AV_CODEC_ID_NONE }
> +};This is tangentally relevant perhaps, but that INDEX_ enum should really be type. Something like ULIndex and a comment with reference to relevant spec section would be nice /Tomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
