On Tue, 29 Aug 2017 03:07:45 +0200 Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 11:21:39AM +0200, wm4 wrote: > > On Sun, 27 Aug 2017 19:16:03 +0200 > > Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 01:26:58AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > > Fixes: loop.m3u > > > > > > > > The default max iteration count of 1000 is arbitrary and ideas for a > > > > better solution are welcome > > > > > > > > Found-by: Xiaohei and Wangchu from Alibaba Security Team > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> > > > > --- > > > > doc/demuxers.texi | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ > > > > libavformat/hls.c | 7 +++++++ > > > > 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+) > > > > > > applied > > > > > > [...] > > > > I rejected this approach, but I guess patch reviews are ignored anyway. > > I explicitly asked if you veto this patch, you did not veto it. > It is extreemly inpolite, to ignore an explicit question about > you objecting and afterwards claim your rejection was ignored. I don't think a patch comment needs to be honored only if it was done as an explicit veto. I didn't understand it this way either. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
