On 8/4/17, Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 8/2/17, Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote: >> Le quintidi 15 thermidor, an CCXXV, Michael Niedermayer a écrit : >>> removing these elements causes command lines using them to fail >>> for example: >>> >>> ./ffmpeg -i matrixbench_mpeg2.mpg -i lena.pnm -filter_complex >>> 'overlay=10:main_h-overlay_h-10:pass' -qscale 2 -t 1 file.avi >> >> Oh, the shorthand notation. The order of the non-essential options has >> changed in the past, including recently, and does not match the >> documentation, I have always considered it undocumented and as such >> unspecified. >> >> Moreover, with a separate object like that, keeping the order will be >> impossible: options added to the filter in the future will always come >> before the options in the framesync object. >> >> Therefore, I consider this minor break of compatibility acceptable. I >> should have mentioned it, but I forgot, sorry. >> >> What do other think? >> > > We should move forward, no need to keep shorthand compatibility for > those options. >
Also what about to porting one of simple filter(just filter_frame call) to activate API, i can not do it myself unless someone show me how. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
