On 1 August 2017 at 12:30, Clément Bœsch <u...@pkh.me> wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 09:18:33AM +0000, Davinder Singh wrote:
> [...]
> > > In particular, the main policy of FFmpeg is to not depend on external
> > > libraries for core features. Therefore, if your project is a separate
> > >
> >
> > Just to be clear, it won't be "external" library like OpenCV...
> >
> >
> > > library, it will definitely not be used by FFmpeg codecs like you wish
> > > in your first paragraph.
> > >
> > > If you want a fighting chance of a project that is not stillborn, I
> > > think you need to make it part of FFmpeg, and make sure important
> > >
> >
> > .. it will be part of FFmpeg like libavfilter, just a new module -
> > libmotion.
> >
>
> yeah, but not a good idea. Just make it an optional component of
> libavutil.
>
> --
> Clément B.
>
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
>
I think I'd rather have it as a separate module. The part of the code could
grow to be quite big and the API quite complex depending on the needs of
encoders and filters.
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to