On 03.07.2017, at 17:17, Derek Buitenhuis <derek.buitenh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/3/2017 2:18 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: >> breaks fate > > I'll look into it tonight; busy today. > > . > . > . > > Aside: > > I'll just add, though, that these two word 'breaks fate' emails > are kind of obnoxious when the test in question was added days > after I sent the set, so I couldn't have possibly tested against > it, and the commit that added the test and this email has /zero/ > info about what the test actually tests (a bug id is not a commit > message). Sure, it would be nice if they had nice names etc., but it's a regression test, it caught a real issue, and it certainly costs on average less time to debug even these opaque test than debugging and fixing after a user finds it... Or maybe I've just been working for too long with randomly generated tests that you simply have to accept and debug as not making any sense... _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
