On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 21:26:47 +0100 Derek Buitenhuis <derek.buitenh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6/29/2017 9:09 PM, wm4 wrote: > > On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 20:45:10 +0100 > > Derek Buitenhuis <derek.buitenh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Keep in mind that C99 bool and C++ > >> bool are not compatible. > >> > > > > (Actually they are.) > > Source? Because, from e.g. glibc: > > /* Supporting <stdbool.h> in C++ is a GCC extension. */ > > And AFAICT, there is *nothing* that guarantees C99's _Bool matches > C++'s bool in size or alignment. It's compiler and ABI dependent > and just happens to work with GCC/G++, no? I meant that both "bool" types are meant to be ABI compatible. (And it holds up even on Windows with MSVC vs. GCC.) But yeah, this would at least require including the correct header for whatever language is used, and C would be forced to at least C99. (FFmpeg uses C99 though.) Anyway, getting offtopic. A build failure seems a bit like a deal breaker, and maybe the strcpy should be killed. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
