On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 1:26 AM, Moritz Barsnick <barsn...@gmx.net> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 22:34:15 +0530, Paras Chadha wrote: > > + t64 = (((uint64_t) ptr8[0]) << 56) | (((uint64_t) ptr8[1]) > << 48) | (((uint64_t) ptr8[2]) << 40) | (((uint64_t) ptr8[3]) << 32) | > (ptr8[4] << 24) | (ptr8[5] << 16) | (ptr8[6] << 8) | ptr8[7]; > > I think you can (or should?) use macros such as av_be2ne64() for this, > and all the other shift-byte-placements throughout the code. (Yes, I > know that operation is doing "ne2be", but there's no macro for that, > probably because it's identical.) In addition to being shorter, they > will evaluate to pure assignments on big-endian platforms. yes, Done _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
