On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 11:36:02 +0200 Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6/8/17, wm4 <nfx...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 08:13:48 +0200 > > Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Signed-off-by: Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com> > >> --- > > > > Feeding the coefficients as additional audio inputs, and using amovie > > to load them, seems like an extremely awkward choice. It would make > > sense to me if there actually were a set of input coefficients per > > actual audio input, but that's not the case. Instead, the efficients > > are a much smaller stream than the main audio input. > > > > Why not load the coefficients directly? > > I'm not going to add yet another movie filter. > The amovie is there just because I used same filtergraph with mpv to > be able to seek. A user would need to connect all the inputs even with ffmpeg CLI. Not sure why you're talking about "another movie filter" - why not just load the coefficients directly, using a custom format if necessary? From what I understand, you need to do something special to produce those coefficient wav files anyway. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
