On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 10:37 PM, Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote: > Le nonidi 29 floréal, an CCXXV, Muhammad Faiz a écrit : >> >> Should fix Ticket6349. > > Forgot: please remove that, it is not true. The bug in this ticket is in > libavcodec, it cannot be fixed by a change in libavfilter.
In my opinion, it can. The bigger problem about alignment should be separated from this ticket e.g opening new ticket that gives failed alignment test case. > >> IMHO, the solution is to document it properly to not mix >> ff_inlink_consume_samples with ff_inlink_consume_frame, similar to >> av_buffersink_get_frame vs av_buffersink_get_samples. > > Maybe. I am not sure I like this solution, but it should be technically > acceptable, unlike no change at all. I would like better something that > gives the performance boost you observe without limiting the > expressiveness of the API, but I do not know if it is possible. A patch documenting it has been posted. Thank's. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
