On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 12:07:59PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote: > Le duodi 22 floréal, an CCXXV, Michael Niedermayer a écrit : > > The direct value like 32 feels more natural to me too, but iam fine > > with either. > > > > The avoidance of log() might also favor the other in some cases btw > > consider you have a 32 and need to call a fuction that needs a log2(32) > > So, shall I push? With the current code or without the 1<<?
I am fine with and withhout 1<<. direct numbers seem more consistent
to existing API like FFALIGN.
It seems though theres still open questions or objections IIUC
so i suspect this will more likely be in 3.3.2 ...
thx
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
Old school: Use the lowest level language in which you can solve the problem
conveniently.
New school: Use the highest level language in which the latest supercomputer
can solve the problem without the user falling asleep waiting.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
