Hi, On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Hendrik Leppkes <h.lepp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 7:17 PM, Ronald S. Bultje <rsbul...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Hendrik Leppkes <h.lepp...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Ronald suggested on IRC that the only parts suffering from this are > >> the ASM DSP components, and we should just make checkasm tests for all > >> of them and let checkasm test the alignment they claim to support, but > >> alas this won't be done for months, if not years. > > > > > > This really isn't that complicated once we get the general design and > goals > > explicitly documented. > > > > We test all kind of crazy stuff in checkasm, like xmm register > clobbering. > > This is just another strange thing that can be done in generic code. We > > just need to decide what is OK so we know what to test. > > > > I'm not worried about checkasm perfoming the test, but all DSP > components actually having tests. Test coverage in general is a fair point, we can work on that... Ronald _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
