Hi Muhammad, On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 10:13 AM, Muhammad Faiz <mfc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 11:22 PM, Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote: > > Le sextidi 16 floréal, an CCXXV, Muhammad Faiz a écrit : > >> But if documentation > >> says that data should be aligned to 4-bytes but I align it to > >> 32-bytes, then there are no violations at all. So what's wrong with > >> this patch? > > > > Useless code performing wasteful operations in speed-critical sections. > > This is not speed-critical section. Not in this case, no. But I believe we have multiple issues in this area and some of the affected areas _are_ speed-critical. Plus, we like speed even if it's pointless. There's no problem with that. Ronald _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
