On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 11:22 PM, Kyle Swanson <k...@ylo.ph> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 3:18 AM, Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 4/30/17, Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote: >>> Le primidi 11 floreal, an CCXXV, Muhammad Faiz a ecrit : >>>> Are you working on these? Because currently I'm not. >>> >>> There is nothing to work on yet: the message you answer to is raising a >>> question about the global design of the internal API. That question >>> needs an answer before any work can be done, and I can not decide alone. >>> >> >> How nice, introducing bug that causes crash and then claiming there is >> not such bug. >> >> Which filters you consider deemed worthy to not crash? >> _______________________________________________ >> ffmpeg-devel mailing list >> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org >> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > Maybe 383057f8e744efeaaa3648a59bc577b25b055835 should be reverted > until API stuff is sorted. This should also be backported to 3.3 > because these issues are present in that release. > > Kyle
Of course no. Reverting it will make more bug. Unless https://lists.ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2017-January/206285.html and https://lists.ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2017-January/206284.html are also applied. Thank's _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
