Le primidi 11 floréal, an CCXXV, James Almer a écrit : > I don't think there's any explicit written rule about it, but in any > case, both Ronald and wm4 had given him the ok for the patch he pushed, > so waiting 24 hours after that is fine. > > It could have waited a bit mainly because it's delicate code that could > break badly if something is done wrong, so the more testing it's given > the better.
I have not read the specifics of this thread, I do not think that Muhammad did anything wrong here. I only react to the mail quoted earlier: https://lists.ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2017-March/208718.html "No objections issues after 24hrs means patch is OK in FFmpeg development." This is just not true, and harmfully so. Regards, -- Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
