On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 08:48:55PM -0300, James Almer wrote: > On 4/14/2017 8:32 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 04:07:41PM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 4:24 AM, Michael Niedermayer > >> <mich...@niedermayer.cc > >>> wrote: > >> > >>> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 09:00:33PM +0100, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote: > >>>> + We strongly recommend users, distributors, and system integrators to > >>>> + upgrade unless they use current git master. > >>> > >>> as some developers had concerns about the release in relation to > >>> merges prior to it, iam not sure we should recommand that or not. > >>> > >>> We could also wait with adding such recommandition and for example > >>> add it for 3.3.1 when no major issues are reported on release/3.3 > >> > >> > >> It's unusual to make a release if we're not sure users should upgrade to > >> it? > > > > iam not sure i understand what you are trying to say? > > but ill try to awnser anyway > > > > I dont think its unusual that after a large number of changes or a long > > time since the last release theres higher uncertanity in the code state. > > > > Nor is it unusual that one doesnt suggest everyone to upgrade to a > > "dot zero" release but waits for .1, for example ubuntu does that AFAIK > > > > Iam not sure what the team prefers, how can i be sure without asking? > > and thats what i did above, i asked > > IMO, since the "we strongly recommend" line has been a constant in all > releases, removing it now will (for those that notice it) rise quite a > few red flags and make people come to the conclusion they should > probably skip it altogether. > If we expect people to use it and hopefully report any issues with it, > we shouldn't do something that will scare them away. > > And really, the tree wasn't any more "unstable" when we branched it > for 3.3 than how it had been when we branched previous releases. All > new release branches featured merges up to some arbitrary point. > It's even been two weeks since the branch was cut, and no outstanding > issues were found even in master, so lets try to not start spreading > uncertainty.
sure, lets do what people prefer [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Dictatorship: All citizens are under surveillance, all their steps and actions recorded, for the politicians to enforce control. Democracy: All politicians are under surveillance, all their steps and actions recorded, for the citizens to enforce control.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
